125 So. 283 (La. 1929), 30027, State ex rel. Arceneaux v. Breaux

Citation: 125 So. 283, 169 La. 394

Opinion Judge: JANVIER, Judge ad hoc.

Party Name: STATE ex rel. ARCENEAUX v. BREAUX. [*] In re BREAUX

Attorney: A. Wilmot Dalferes and J. J. Davidson, Jr., both of Lafayette, for applicant. Waldo H. Dugas, of Lafayette (Mouton & De Baillon, of Lafayette, of counsel), for respondent.

Judge Panel: JANVIER OVERTON, J. BRUNOT, J. LAND, J. OVERTON OVERTON, J. (dissenting). The Constitution of this state reads as follows: In my humble view, the conclusion reached by the majority, contravenes the fundamental rules, established for the interpretation of constitutions. The process by which the co...

Case Date: Tuesday November 12, 1929

Court: Louisiana Supreme Court