125 S.E.2d 684 (Ga.App. 1962), 39422, King Sales Co. v. Mckey

Citation: 125 S.E.2d 684, 105 Ga.App. 787

Party Name: KING SALES COMPANY, Inc., et al. v. Minnie McKEY.

Attorney: The judgment for the plaintiff was authorized by the evidence, no error appears from the rulings complained of in the amended motion for new trial, and the trial court did not err in overruling either the defendants' plea in bar or plea of res judicata., This is the second appearance of this case...

Case Date: Wednesday April 04, 1962

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

125 S.E.2d 684 (Ga.App. 1962), 39422, King Sales Co. v. Mckey

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 105 S.E. 373 (Ga.App. 1920), 11688, Kaufman Metal Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.
Georgia - 136 S.E. 60 (Ga. 1926), 5228, Bailey v. Holmes
Georgia - 197 S.E. 833 (Ga. 1938), 12232, Sumner v. Sumner
Georgia - 103 S.E.2d 583 (Ga.App. 1958), 37123, Augusta Roofing & Metal Works, Inc. v. Clemmons
Georgia - 111 S.E.2d 632 (Ga.App. 1959), 37871, Williams v. Richards

See all quotations