125 A. 484 (N.J.Eq. 1923), McVoy v. Baumann
Citation:
125 A. 484, 95 N.J.Eq. 335
Opinion Judge:
PER CURIAM.
Party Name:
MARY E. McVOY, respondent, v. KARL BAUMANN and RUTH C. NAUGLE et al., appellants
Attorney:
Mr. Earl A. Merrill, for the complainant. Mr. Augustus C. Nash, for the defendants.
Judge Panel:
For affirmance--THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK. For reversal--None. For affirmance--THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, HEPPENHEIMER, GARDNER, ACKERSON, VAN BUSKI...
Case Date:
Tuesday December 04, 1923
Court:
New Jersey Supreme Court
Linked as: