124 S.E.2d 778 (S.C. 1962), 17891, State v. Prince

Citation: 124 S.E.2d 778, 240 S.C. 96

Opinion Judge: MOSS, Justice.

Party Name: The STATE, Respondent, v. Maggie PRINCE, Appellant.

Attorney: Marshall W. Abercrombie, Esq., of Laurens, for Appellant, cites: As to circumstantial evidence not being sufficient to sustain conviction: 191 S.C. 238, 4 S.E.2d 121. As to mere presence not constituting aiding and abetting in legal contemplation: 70 S.E.2d 5, 235 N.C. 410. William T. Jones, Esq....

Case Date: Wednesday March 28, 1962

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court