123 S.W.2d 911 (Tex.Civ.App. 1938), 8635, Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.

Citation: 123 S.W.2d 911

Opinion Judge: BAUGH, Justice. BAUGH, Justice.

Party Name: STANOLIND OIL & GAS CO. v. MIDAS OIL CO. ET AL.

Attorney: Turner, Rodgers & Winn, F. J. Scurlock, and W. W. Prior, all of Dallas (Clay Tallman and Donald Campbell, both of Tulsa, Okl., of counsel), for appellant. Carl W. Wade and E. S. McCord, both of Dallas, for appellees Midas Oil Co. and others. Wm. McCraw, Atty. Gen., and Chas. D. Rutta, Asst. Atty....

Case Date: Wednesday May 25, 1938

Court: Texas Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

123 S.W.2d 911 (Tex.Civ.App. 1938), 8635, Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Midas Oil Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 105 S.W.2d 787 (Tex.Civ.App. 1937), 8612, Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad Commission of Texas
Texas - 109 S.W.2d 967 (Tex. 1937), 7294, Railroad Commission of Texas v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.
Texas - 120 S.W.2d 544 (Tex.Civ.App. 1938), 8623, Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Railroad Commission
Texas - 41 S.W.2d 1074 (Tex.Civ.App. 1931), 7615, Texas Motor Coaches, Inc. v. Railroad Commission
Texas - 44 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.Com.App. 1932), 1311-5814, Southern Surety Co. v. Arter

See all quotations