123 Cal.App.2d 91, 15625, Lilienthal v. Hastings Clothing Co.

Citation: 123 Cal.App.2d 91, 266 P.2d 56

Opinion Judge: [10] Bray

Party Name: Lilienthal v. Hastings Clothing Co.

Attorney: [7] Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon and Dana, Bledsoe & Smith and R. S. Cathcart for Appellants. [8] Sloss & Eliot and Elmer P. Delany for Respondent.

Case Date: Friday February 05, 1954

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

123 Cal.App.2d 91, 15625, Lilienthal v. Hastings Clothing Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 189 Cal. 732, S. F. 10046, Diamond v. Superior Court
California - 23 Cal.2d 511, 16724, Caminetti v. Edward Brown & Sons
California - 31 Cal.2d 110, 19831, Fickett v. Rauch
California - 33 Cal.2d 134, 20583, Palmer v. City of Long Beach
California - 19 Cal.App.2d 78, 10792, Conlin v. Coyne

See all quotations