121 S.E.2d 221 (S.C. 1961), 17813, Brazell v. City of Camden

Citation: 121 S.E.2d 221, 238 S.C. 580

Opinion Judge: TAYLOR, Chief Justice.

Party Name: Rayford T. BRAZELL, Respondent, v. CITY OF CAMDEN, South Carolina, Appellant.

Attorney: Harold W. Funderburk, Esq., of Camden, for Appellant, cites: As to a husband or wife not having a cause of action for damages and loss of consortium when the other party has suffered an injury resulting from an alleged defect in a street: 234 S.C. 428, 108 S.E.2d 825; 227 S.C. 458, 88 S.E.2d 617;...

Case Date: July 31, 1961

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

121 S.E.2d 221 (S.C. 1961), 17813, Brazell v. City of Camden

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 166 S.E. 120 (S.C. 1932), 13478, Reeves v. City of Easley
South Carolina - 108 S.E.2d 825 (S.C. 1959), 17534, McKenzie v. City of Florence
South Carolina - 121 S.E.2d 213 (S.C. 1961), 17814, Hollifield v. Keller
South Carolina - 3 S.E.2d 42 (S.C. 1939), 14881, Brooks v. One Motor Bus Carrying 1937-38 South Carolina License V 1357, Motor 45590, Serial 40476
South Carolina - 59 S.E.2d 132 (S.C. 1950), 16343, Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service Authority

See all quotations