120 S.E.2d 42 (Ga.App. 1961), 38819, Norman v. Norman

Citation: 120 S.E.2d 42, 103 Ga.App. 626

Opinion Judge: NICHOLS, Judge.

Party Name: Carrie E. NORMAN v. Mary D. NORMAN.

Attorney: 2. Where the defendant or her counsel has reason to believe that a prospective juror is related to one of plaintiff's counsel (which counsel has a contingent fee contract with the plaintiff), the defendant is bound to make an investigation to determine if the relationship exists, and in the absen...

Judge Panel: CARLISLE, P. J., and EBERHARDT, J., concur.

Case Date: Tuesday April 25, 1961

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

120 S.E.2d 42 (Ga.App. 1961), 38819, Norman v. Norman

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 187 S.E. 899 (Ga.App. 1936), 25581, A. G. Boone Co. v. Owens
Georgia - 55 S.E. 55 (Ga. 1906), M.H. Lauchheimer & Sons v. Jacobs
Georgia - 60 S.E. 461 (Ga. 1908), City of Madison v. Thomas
Georgia - 85 S.E. 978 (Ga.App. 1915), 6218, Mitchell v. J.S. Schofield's Sons Co.
Georgia - 109 S.E.2d 900 (Ga.App. 1959), 37694, Norman v. Norman

See all quotations