120 Cal.App.3d 622, 60471, Columbus Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc.

Citation: 120 Cal.App.3d 622, 174 Cal.Rptr. 527

Opinion Judge: [10] Lillie

Party Name: Columbus Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc.

Attorney: [7] Overton, Lyman & Prince, Jon P. Kardassakis and George M. Lindahl for Cross-complainants and Appellants. [8] Cruikshank, Antin & Grebow and Michael A. Vanic for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday May 18, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

120 Cal.App.3d 622, 60471, Columbus Line, Inc. v. Gray Line Sight-Seeing Companies Associated, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 47 Cal.2d 163, 19572, Southern Public Utility Dist. v. Silva
California - 58 Cal.2d 601, 26913, Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co.
California - 12 Cal.3d 229, 17007, In re Russell
California - 19 Cal.3d 165, 30701, Levy v. Cohen
California - 2 Cal.3d 752, 29668, Martin v. Martin

See all quotations