120 Cal.App.3d 428, 19296, McKinney v. Nash

Citation: 120 Cal.App.3d 428, 174 Cal.Rptr. 642

Opinion Judge: [10] Young

Party Name: McKinney v. Nash

Attorney: [7] Maxim N. Bach for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Carlton, Borchard, Cowling & Fisher, Gary C. Borchard and William W. Coshow for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: June 16, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

120 Cal.App.3d 428, 19296, McKinney v. Nash

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 216 Cal. 397, Sac. 4553, In re Lances' Estate
California - 62 Cal.2d 154, 21771, Quintal v. Laurel Grove Hospital
California - 67 Cal.2d 319, 22511, Tomei v. Henning
California - 15 Cal.3d 351, 30394, Newing v. Cheatham
California - 2 Cal.3d 741, 29737, Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist.

See all quotations