119 S.E.2d 123 (Ga.App. 1961), 38632, Spiegel v. Hays

Citation: 119 S.E.2d 123, 103 Ga.App. 293

Party Name: Stanley SPIEGEL v. W. G. HAYS, Jr., et al.

Attorney: (b) Where the contract recites that it represents the entire agreement between the parties and no deviation therefrom shall exist unless mutually agreed to by all parties and reduced to writing, it cannot be shown by extrinsic parol evidence that one of the signatories did not sign, as recited in...

Case Date: Friday February 24, 1961

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

119 S.E.2d 123 (Ga.App. 1961), 38632, Spiegel v. Hays

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 106 S.E. 20 (Ga.App. 1921), 11818, Griner v. Smith
Georgia - 106 S.E. 20 (Ga.App. 1921), 11627, Smith v. Bradshaw
Georgia - 127 S.E. 872 (Ga. 1925), 4733, F. & W. Grand Five-Ten-Twenty-five Cent Stores, Inc. v. Eiseman
Georgia - 141 S.E. 48 (Ga. 1927), 6136, Byrd v. Piha
Georgia - 161 S.E. 355 (Ga. 1931), 8396, Harp v. First Nat. Bank

See all quotations