119 A. 48 (Conn. 1922), Ruocco v. United Advertising Corp.

Citation: 119 A. 48, 98 Conn. 241

Opinion Judge: BEACH, J.

Party Name: RUOCCO v. UNITED ADVERTISING CORPORATION et al.

Attorney: George E. Beers and William H. Russell, both of New Haven, for appellant. De Lancey S. Pelgrift, of Hartford, for appellee United Advertising Corporation.

Judge Panel: Webb, J., dissenting. In this opinion the other Judges concurred, except WEBB, J., who dissented.

Case Date: Monday November 27, 1922

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

119 A. 48 (Conn. 1922), Ruocco v. United Advertising Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 33 A. 587 (Conn. 1895), O'Keefe v. National Folding Box & Paper Co.
Connecticut - 65 A. 157 (Conn. 1906), Wilmot v. McPadden
Connecticut - 92 A. 675 (Conn. 1914), Smith v. Town of Milford
Connecticut - 93 A. 529 (Conn. 1915), Pastorello v. Stone
Connecticut - 30 Conn. 535 (Conn. 1862), City of Norwich v. Breed