Party Name:
CONVERSE, Receiver, Appellant, v. HAMILTON, Respondent
Attorney:
For the appellant there was a brief by Jones & Schubring, attorneys, and C. A. Severance, of counsel, and oral argument by B. W. Jones. For the respondent there was a brief by Sanborn & Blake, and oral argument by John B. Sanborn.
Judge Panel:
JOHN BARNES, J. WILLIAM H. TIMLIN, J., dissented. TIMLIN TIMLIN, J. (dissenting.) Upon the questions involved in this cause I think the law is in a regrettable condition of uncertainty. Hancock Nat. Bank v. Farnum, 176 U.S. 640, 20 S.Ct. 506, 44 L.Ed. 619; Huntington v. Attrill, 146 U.S. 657, 36 ...
