117 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio 1954), 33756, In re Hertz

Citation: 117 N.E.2d 925, 161 Ohio St. 70

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM

Party Name: In re HERTZ.

Attorney: Carl C. Hertz, in pro. per. C. William O'Neill, Atty. Gen., Thomas R. Lloyd, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Earl N. Merwin, Columbus, for respondent.

Judge Panel: WEYGANDT, C. J., and MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.

Case Date: February 24, 1954

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

117 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio 1954), 33756, In re Hertz

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 116 N.E.2d 711 (Ohio 1953), 33432, Baker v. Myers
Ohio - 117 N.E.2d 705 (Ohio 1954), 33828, Hall Bros. v. City of Cleveland
Ohio - 117 N.E.2d 925 (Ohio 1954), 33624, State ex rel. De Boe v. Industrial Commission