117 Cal.App.3d 397, 59462, Roosevelt v. Roosevelt

Citation: 117 Cal.App.3d 397, 172 Cal.Rptr. 641

Opinion Judge: [10] Potter

Party Name: Roosevelt v. Roosevelt

Attorney: [7] Joslyn, Roeth, Angerhofer, Olds & Condon and Daniel Condon for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Fleming, Anderson, McClung & Finch and Lee W. Salisbury for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: March 26, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

117 Cal.App.3d 397, 59462, Roosevelt v. Roosevelt

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 145 Cal. 777, L. A. 1594, Holmes v. Marshall
California - 215 Cal. 548, L. A. 13519, Bailey v. Superior Court
California - 16 Cal.2d 532, 4316, In re Smallbone
California - 47 Cal.2d 469, 6732, Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. Palermo
California - 53 Cal.2d 313, 20285, Vallerga v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control

See all quotations