117 Cal.App.3d 212, 58446, Holmes v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 117 Cal.App.3d 212, 172 Cal.Rptr. 589

Opinion Judge: [10] Files

Party Name: Holmes v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Locke, Locke & Rudman and Berry D. Locke for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Burt Pines, City Attorney, Siegfried O. Hillmer, Assistant City Attorney, and Mary Jo Curwen, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: March 24, 1981

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

117 Cal.App.3d 212, 58446, Holmes v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 58 Cal.2d 862, 26927, Steven v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York
California - 17 Cal.3d 699, 30526, Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
California - 21 Cal.3d 859, 23803, Betts v. Board of Administration
California - 188 Cal.App.2d 690, 19148, Neal v. State Farm Ins. Companies
California - 249 Cal.App.2d 577, 29665, Grace v. City of Los Angeles

See all quotations