117 A.2d 620 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1955), A-405, Nathan v. Electriglas Corp.

Citation: 117 A.2d 620, 37 N.J.Super. 494

Opinion Judge: PINDAR, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Party Name: Edward Anton NATHAN, an infant, by his Guardian ad litem, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ELECTRIGLAS CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Attorney: Robert R. Daly, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Robert O. Bentley, Jr., Hackensack, attorney). Julius E. Kramer, Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Harold Jacobs, Hackensack, attorney).

Judge Panel: Before Judges DAVIDSON, SPEAKMAN and PINDAR.

Case Date: Wednesday November 02, 1955

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

117 A.2d 620 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1955), A-405, Nathan v. Electriglas Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 128 A. 242 (N.J.L. 1925), 56, Heckel v. Ford Motor Co.
New Jersey - 19 A. 472 (N.J. 1890), Winkle v. The American Steam Boiler Co.
New Jersey - 72 A.2d 187 (N.J. 1950), No. A--89, Callahan v. National Lead Co.
New Jersey - 72 A.2d 326 (N.J. 1950), No. A--93, McKinney v. Public Service Interstate Transportation Company
New Jersey - 74 A.2d 307 (N.J. 1950), No. A--142, Antonio v. Edwards

See all quotations