117 A. 1 (Conn. 1922), La Croix v. Donovan

Citation: 117 A. 1, 97 Conn. 414

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: LA CROIX et al. v. DONOVAN.

Attorney: Thomas M. Cullinan, John J. Cullinan, and Vincent L. Keating, all of Bridgeport, in support of plea in abatement. Spotswood D. Bowers, of New York City, and Charles E. Williamson, of Bridgeport, opposed.

Judge Panel: Gager, J., dissenting. GAGER, J., dissented.

Case Date: Friday May 05, 1922

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

117 A. 1 (Conn. 1922), La Croix v. Donovan

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 103 A. 940 (Conn. 1918), Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Plume
Connecticut - 65 A. 1065 (Conn. 1907), General Hospital Soc. v. New Haven Rendering Co.
Connecticut - 65 A. 965 (Conn. 1907), New York, N.H. & H. R. Co. v. Illy
Connecticut - 89 A. 909 (Conn. 1914), Mercer Elec. Mfg. Co. v. Connecticut Elec. Mfg. Co.
Connecticut - 96 A. 154 (Conn. 1915), Cramer v. Reeb