116 S.E.2d 240 (Ga.App. 1960), 38339, Vinson v. State

Citation: 116 S.E.2d 240, 102 Ga.App. 327

Party Name: Dale VINSON v. STATE.

Attorney: It was not error to deny the motion for new trial., Fullbright & Duffey, Rome, for plaintiff in error., Chastine Parker, Sol. Gen., Rome, for defendant in error.

Case Date: September 08, 1960

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

116 S.E.2d 240 (Ga.App. 1960), 38339, Vinson v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 159 S.E. 143 (Ga.App. 1931), 21450, Dyson v. State
Georgia - 179 S.E. 822 (Ga.App. 1935), 24451, Morris v. State
Georgia - 195 S.E. 923 (Ga.App. 1938), 26559, Scott v. State
Georgia - 53 S.E. 606 (Ga. 1906), Bowden v. Bowden
Georgia - 116 S.E.2d 254 (Ga.App. 1960), 38347, Southern Optical Service, Inc. v. Chominski

See all quotations