116 N.E. 298 (Ind. 1917), 22,589, Winfield v. McCaslin

Citation: 116 N.E. 298, 186 Ind. 307

Opinion Judge: Harvey, J.

Party Name: Winfield v. McCaslin

Attorney: Maurice Winfield, W. T. Wilson and Rabb & Mahoney, for appellant. William N. Harding, Alfred R. Hovey, O. U. Newman and Charles E. Hale, for appellee.

Case Date: Tuesday May 29, 1917

Court: Indiana Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

116 N.E. 298 (Ind. 1917), 22,589, Winfield v. McCaslin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Indiana - 108 N.E. 231 (Ind. 1915), 22,410, Cline v. Beaver
Indiana - 116 N.E. 301 (Ind. 1917), 22,961, Bowers v. Starbuck
Indiana - 48 N.E. 1027 (Ind. 1898), 18,055, Abshire v. Williamson
Indiana - 71 N.E. 890 (Ind. 1904), 20,384, Dunn v. State ex rel. Eakin
Indiana - 82 N.E. 552 (Ind.App. 1907), 5,938, Eder v. Kreiter

See all quotations