115 S.E. 764 (S.C. 1923), 11000, Wilson v. Southern Ry., Carolina Division

Citation: 115 S.E. 764, 123 S.C. 399

Opinion Judge: MARION, J.

Party Name: WILSON v. SOUTHERN RY., CAROLINA DIVISION, ET AL.

Attorney: Wilson & Wilson, of Rock Hill, Thos. F. McDow, of York, and J. Harry Foster, of Rock Hill, for appellant. McDonald & McDonald, of Winnsboro, and Spencer, Spencer & White and Dunlap & Dunlap, all of Rock Hill, for respondents.

Case Date: January 18, 1923

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

115 S.E. 764 (S.C. 1923), 11000, Wilson v. Southern Ry., Carolina Division

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 14 S.C. 571 (S.C. 1881), 998, First Nat. Bank of Charleston v. Gary
South Carolina - 16 S.C. 132 (S.C. 1881), CASE 1102, Ellen v. Ellen
South Carolina - 113 S.E. 360 (S.C. 1922), 10985, Turner v. Southern Ry. Co.
South Carolina - 26 S.E. 787 (S.C. 1897), Metz v. Metz
South Carolina - 30 S.E. 617 (S.C. 1898), Levi v. Gardner

See all quotations