115 S.E.2d 696 (Ga.App. 1960), 38388, City of Bainbridge v. Youngblood

Citation: 115 S.E.2d 696, 102 Ga.App. 195

Party Name: CITY OF BAINBRIDGE v. Gladys L. YOUNGBLOOD.

Attorney: The evidence is amply sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. The trial, court did not err in refusing the motion for a directed verdict, the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the motion for a new trial., This is a damage suit brought by Mrs. Gladys L. Youngblood (here...

Case Date: Wednesday June 29, 1960

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

115 S.E.2d 696 (Ga.App. 1960), 38388, City of Bainbridge v. Youngblood

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 35 S.E.2d 472 (Ga.App. 1945), 31014, Lane Drug Stores v. Story
Georgia - 48 S.E.2d 891 (Ga. 1948), 16263-16265, Ingram v. State
Georgia - 89 S.E.2d 581 (Ga.App. 1955), 35871, White v. City of Manchester