114 A. 92 (Conn. 1921), Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell Corp.

Citation: 114 A. 92, 96 Conn. 414

Opinion Judge: CURTIS, J.

Party Name: ESPOSITO v. MARLIN-ROCKWELL CORPORATION et al.

Attorney: Arthur B. O'Keefe and Anthony P. Adinolfi, both of New Haven, for plaintiff. Philip Pond and William H. Hitchings, both of New Haven, for defendants.

Case Date: June 01, 1921

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

114 A. 92 (Conn. 1921), Esposito v. Marlin-Rockwell Corp.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Indiana - 117 N.E. 268 (Ind.App. 1917), 10,023, In re McCaskey
Indiana - 118 N.E. 315 (Ind.App. 1918), 10,046, Hornbrook-Price Company v. Stewart
Illinois - 113 N.E. 877 (Ill. 1916), 10625, Haiselden v. Industrial Board of Ill.
Massachusetts - 228 Mass. 31 (1917), Brown's Case
Michigan - 166 N.W. 1013 (Mich. 1918), 72, Cooke v. Holland Furnace Co.

See all quotations