113 S.E. 623 (N.C. 1922), 31, Latham v. Latham

Citation: 113 S.E. 623, 184 N.C. 55

Opinion Judge: HOKE, J.

Party Name: LATHAM ET AL. v. LATHAM ET AL.

Attorney: Daniel & Carter and Small, MacLean, Bragaw & Rodman, all of Washington, N. C., for appellants. Ward & Grimes, of Washington, N. C., and Moore & Dunn and Guion & Guion, all of Newbern, for appellees.

Case Date: September 20, 1922

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

113 S.E. 623 (N.C. 1922), 31, Latham v. Latham

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 109 S.E. 373 (N.C. 1921), 103, In re Johnson's Will
North Carolina - 112 S.E. 32 (N.C. 1922), 446, Rankin v. Oates
North Carolina - 19 S.E. 365 (N.C. 1894), Cox v. Brower
North Carolina - 3 S.E. 359 (N.C. 1887), Trustees of University of N.C. v. State Nat. Bank
North Carolina - 36 S.E. 172 (N.C. 1900), Dunn v. Beaman

See all quotations