113 P.2d 987 (Okla. 1941), 29154, City of Tulsa v. State Indus. Com'n

Citation: 113 P.2d 987, 189 Okla. 73, 1941 OK 181

Opinion Judge: OSBORN, Justice.

Party Name: CITY OF TULSA et al. v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION et al.

Attorney: Harold C. Stuart and E. J. Doerner, both of Tulsa, for petitioners. Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondent Industrial Commission. B. A. Hamilton and S. J. Clendinning, both of Tulsa, for respondent Tom Hughes.

Case Date: Tuesday May 27, 1941

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

113 P.2d 987 (Okla. 1941), 29154, City of Tulsa v. State Indus. Com'n

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oklahoma - 20 P.2d 141 (Okla. 1933), 23595, Rorabaugh-Brown Dry Goods Co. v. Mathews
Oklahoma - 21 P.2d 1049 (Okla. 1933), 23566, Spivey & McGill v. Nixon
Oklahoma - 22 P.2d 379 (Okla. 1933), 24184, Hardy Sanitarium v. De Hart
Oklahoma - 23 P.2d 694 (Okla. 1933), 23384, City of Duncan v. Ray
Oklahoma - 50 P.2d 398 (Okla. 1935), 26111, Board of Com'rs of Tulsa County v. Bilby

See all quotations