113 A. 172 (Conn. 1921), Hewitt v. Hicock

Citation: 113 A. 172, 96 Conn. 176

Opinion Judge: BEACH, J.

Party Name: HEWITT et al. v. HICOCK et al.

Attorney: Harrison Hewitt and George D. Watrous, Jr., both of New Haven, for plaintiffs. George R. Sturges, of Woodbury, for Ruth Judson Stiles. Matthew A. Reynolds, of New Haven, for Frances J. Hicock and others. Livingston W. Cleaveland, of New Haven, for David Stiles.

Case Date: April 05, 1921

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

113 A. 172 (Conn. 1921), Hewitt v. Hicock

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 113 A. 170 (Conn. 1921), Goldberg v. Callender Bros., Inc.
Connecticut - 15 A. 406 (Conn. 1888), Lawrence v. Security Co.
Connecticut - 50 A. 735 (Conn. 1901), Bancroft v. Security Co. of Hartford
Connecticut - 58 A. 227 (Conn. 1904), Webb v. Lines
Connecticut - 71 A. 583 (Conn. 1909), Bishop v. Bishop