112 So. 209 (Ala. 1927), 8 Div. 886, Booth v. Bates
Linked as:
Extract
112 So. 209 (Ala. 1927), 8 Div. 886, Booth v. Bates
No longer available (Autolink)
See the full content of this document
This document cites
- Federal Cases - 115 F. 906 (N.D.Ala. 1902), In re Tune
- Federal Cases - 186 F. 79 (9th Cir. 1911), 1,845, In re Forbes
- Federal Cases - 283 F. 29 (8th Cir. 1922), 214, Schrepel v. Davis
- Federal Cases - 190 U.S. 294 (1903), 226, Lockwood v. Exchange Bank
- Federal Cases - 229 U.S. 511 (1913), 249, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. Hall