112 S.E.2d 652 (S.C. 1960), 17610, Wineglass v. McMinn

Citation: 112 S.E.2d 652, 235 S.C. 537

Opinion Judge: STUKES, Chief Justice.

Party Name: Elijah WINEGLASS, Respondent, v. H. R. McMINN and Charles S. Sharp, Copartners, d/b/a Dr. Pepper Bottling Company, Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Bailey & Buckley, of Charleston, for Appellants, cite: As to there being no evidence of actionable negligence on part of defendants: 177 S.C. 295, 181 S.E. 1; 5 A Am. Jur. 623, Sec. 632; 5 Am. Jur. 720, Sec. 382; 5 Blashfield's Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice 125, Sec. 2921; 67 ...

Case Date: February 08, 1960

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

112 S.E.2d 652 (S.C. 1960), 17610, Wineglass v. McMinn

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 126 S.E. 441 (S.C. 1925), 11671, Green v. Atlanta & C. A. L. R. Co.
South Carolina - 138 S.E. 831 (S.C. 1927), 12237, Williamson v. Pike
South Carolina - 167 S.E. 826 (S.C. 1933), 13576, Tate v. Claussen-Lawrence Const. Co.
South Carolina - 53 S.E. 166 (S.C. 1906), Banks v. Southern Express Co.
South Carolina - 86 S.E. 202 (S.C. 1915), 9194, Osteen v. South Carolina Cotton Oil Co.

See all quotations