111 Cal.App.2d 395, 14426, Cross v. Tustin

Citation: 111 Cal.App.2d 395, 244 P.2d 731

Opinion Judge: [10] Dooling

Party Name: Cross v. Tustin

Attorney: [7] Nancy Cross, in pro. per., for Appellant. [8] Howard W. Campen, County Counsel, Donald K. Currlin, Assistant County Counsel, and Wade H. Hover, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday May 28, 1952

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

111 Cal.App.2d 395, 14426, Cross v. Tustin

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 12 Cal.2d 662, 16094, Neuwald v. Brock
California - 19 Cal.2d 344, 5490, Wiles v. State Personnel Board
California - 20 Cal.2d 178, 17810, Scully v. State of California
California - 111 Cal.App.2d 404, 2804, People v. Sorensen
California - 51 Cal.App.2d 456, 13008, Meyer v. Board of Public Works