111 A. 869 (Conn. 1920), Valentine v. Pollak

Citation: 111 A. 869, 95 Conn. 556

Opinion Judge: WHEELER, C.J.

Party Name: VALENTINE v. POLLAK.

Attorney: Henry E. Shannon and Frank L. Wilder, both of Bridgeport, for appellant. William F. Tammany, Paul R. Connery, and John J. Cuneo, all of South Norwalk, for appellee.

Case Date: Wednesday December 22, 1920

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

111 A. 869 (Conn. 1920), Valentine v. Pollak

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 111 A. 837 (Conn. 1920), Oviatt v. Wojcicky
Connecticut - 33 A. 902 (Conn. 1895), Ward v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Connecticut - 61 A. 963 (Conn. 1905), Noxon v. Remington
Connecticut - 78 A. 582 (Conn. 1911), Marri v. Stamford St. R. Co.
Connecticut - 96 A. 411 (Conn. 1916), State v. Carta

See all quotations