110 S.E. 668 (S.C. 1922), 10816, State v. Herring

Citation: 110 S.E. 668, 118 S.C. 386

Opinion Judge: COTHRAN, J.

Party Name: STATE v. HERRING.

Attorney: A. H. Dagnall and Leon L. Rice, both of Anderson, for appellant. S. M. Wolfe, Atty. Gen., L. W. Harris, Sol., and Bonham & Allen, all of Anderson, and Bonham & Price, of Greenville, for the State.

Case Date: Wednesday January 25, 1922

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

110 S.E. 668 (S.C. 1922), 10816, State v. Herring

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Indiana - 3 N.E. 836 (Ind. 1885), 11,095, The Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati and Indianapolis Railroad Company v. Newell
South Carolina - 105 S.E. 638 (S.C. 1920), 10534, State v. McPhail
South Carolina - 26 S.E. 567 (S.C. 1897), State v. Dill
South Carolina - 43 S.E. 307 (S.C. 1902), Oliver v. Columbia, N. & L.R. Co.
South Carolina - 45 S.E. 810 (S.C. 1903), Gosa v. Southern Ry.

See all quotations