110 S.E. 618 (N.C. 1922), 9, In re Hamilton

Citation: 110 S.E. 618, 183 N.C. 57

Opinion Judge: STACY, J.

Party Name: IN RE HAMILTON.

Attorney: Tooly & McMullan, of Belhaven, for petitioner. Ward & Grimes and Small, MacLean, Bragaw & Rodman, all of Washington, N. C., for respondents.

Case Date: Wednesday March 01, 1922

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

110 S.E. 618 (N.C. 1922), 9, In re Hamilton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 100 S.E. 76 (N.C. 1919), 13, Ex parte Warren
North Carolina - 108 S.E. 385 (N.C. 1921), 23, In re Hamilton
North Carolina - 69 S.E. 65 (N.C. 1910), Stokes v. Cogdell
North Carolina - 90 S.E. 928 (N.C. 1916), 580, In re Fain
North Carolina - 95 S.E. 487 (N.C. 1918), 301, Atkinson v. Downing

See all quotations