110 S.E. 342 (Ga.App. 1922), 12523, Morris v. Battey

Citation: 110 S.E. 342, 28 Ga.App. 90

Opinion Judge: BROYLES, C.J.

Party Name: MORRIS v. BATTEY.

Attorney: Mitchell & Mitchell, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error. E. F. Childress and Mark Bolding, both of Atlanta, for defendant in error.

Judge Panel: Bloodworth, J., dissenting. LUKE, J., concurs. BLOODWORTH, J. (dissenting), after stating the facts, supra: The writer thinks the certiorari should have been sustained. In Lynch v. Poole, supra, the Supreme Court held:

Case Date: Wednesday January 18, 1922

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals