110 S.E.2d 422 (Ga.App. 1959), 37766, Austin v. State

Citation: 110 S.E.2d 422, 100 Ga.App. 142

Opinion Judge: CARLISLE, Judge.

Party Name: Terry AUSTIN v. STATE.

Attorney: 2. 'When a portion of a charge, which is complained of generally, contains several distinct propositions and one or more of the same is correct in the abstract, then the general assignment of error is not good and will not be further considered, because it in effect improperly alleges that all of...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and TOWNSEND, J., concur.

Case Date: Wednesday September 09, 1959

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

110 S.E.2d 422 (Ga.App. 1959), 37766, Austin v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 155 S.E. 906 (Ga.App. 1930), 20878, Holliman v. State
Georgia - 200 S.E. 243 (Ga. 1938), 12458, Lankford v. Holton
Georgia - 33 S.E. 644 (Ga. 1899), Anderson v. Southern Ry. Co.
Georgia - 91 S.E. 32 (Ga. 1916), 106, Bowen v. Smith-Hall Grocery Co.
Georgia - 110 S.E.2d 434 (Ga.App. 1959), 37767, Austin v. State

See all quotations