110 P.2d 979 (Colo. 1941), 14669, Elliott v. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver

Citation: 110 P.2d 979, 107 Colo. 231

Opinion Judge: Counsel for plaintiff, to sustain the judgment, argue, and rely principally upon, the proposition that evidence as to mistake, fraud and inadvertence with regard to the insertion of an assumption clause in a deed is inadmissible unless a defense upon that ground is specially pleaded. This question was first raised by plaintiff's counsel after the o

Party Name: ELLIOTT v. DENVER JOINT STOCK LAND BANK OF DENVER.

Attorney: [107 Colo. 232] Blount, January & Yegge and Silverstein & Silverstein, all of Denver, for plaintiff in error. J. Donovan Stapp and Glenn A. Laughlin, both of Denver, for defendant in error.

Judge Panel: YOUNG, BAKKE, and KNOUS, JJ., dissenting. YOUNG, BAKKE and KNOUS, JJ., dissent.

Case Date: February 03, 1941

Court: Colorado Supreme Court