110 Cal.App.2d 820, 15051, Fletter v. City & County of S. F.

Citation: 110 Cal.App.2d 820, 244 P.2d 59

Opinion Judge: [10] Bray

Party Name: Fletter v. City & County of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Emmett R. Burns, Arthur C. Zief and Rinaldo A. Carmazzi for Appellant. [8] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, Lawrence S. Mana and Donald Kropp, Deputy City Attorneys, for Respondent.

Case Date: Friday May 09, 1952

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

110 Cal.App.2d 820, 15051, Fletter v. City & County of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 107 Cal. 563, 15846, Davis v. Pacific Power Co.
California - 211 Cal. 556, Sac. 4244, Mautino v. Sutter Hospital Ass'n
California - 19 Cal.2d 647, 18116, Neel v. Mannings, Inc.
California - 84 Cal.App. 479, Civ. 5512, Hassell v. Denning
California - 34 Cal.App.2d 462, 2085, Vitrano v. Westgate Sea Products Co.

See all quotations

110 Cal.App.2d 820, 15051, Fletter v. City &amp; County of S. F.

110 Cal.App.2d 820, 15051, Fletter v. City & County of S. F.