11 Cal.App.4th 816, G011755, Rogalski v. Nabers Cadillac

Citation: 11 Cal.App.4th 816, 14 Cal.Rptr.2d 286

Opinion Judge: [10] Wallin

Party Name: Rogalski v. Nabers Cadillac

Attorney: [7] Rudolph & Rohr, William J. Rohr, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland and Marc J. Poster for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Mundell, Odlum & Haws, Thomas C. Mundell and James A. Odlum for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: December 10, 1992

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

11 Cal.App.4th 816, G011755, Rogalski v. Nabers Cadillac

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 32 Cal.3d 892, 31481, Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
California - 121 Cal.App.2d 729, 4732, Campbell v. Veith
California - 227 Cal.App.2d 380, 10617, Daley v. Butte County
California - 242 Cal.App.2d 787, 22916, Dobbins v. Hardister
California - 259 Cal.App.2d 347, 8653, Orange Empire Nat. Bank v. Kirk

See all quotations