109 So.2d 135 (Ala. 1959), 6 Div. 42, Department of Indus. Relations v. Walker

Citation: 109 So.2d 135, 268 Ala. 507

Opinion Judge: GOODWYN, Justice.

Party Name: DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS et al. v. Homer B. WALKER and Samuel Danzy.

Attorney: J. Eugene Foster and Richard S. Brooks, Montgomery, for Dept. of Ind. Relations. E. L. All, Jas. C. Blair and White, Bradley, Arant, All & Rose, Birmingham, for Stockham Valve & Fittings, opposed.

Case Date: Thursday February 12, 1959

Court: Alabama Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

109 So.2d 135 (Ala. 1959), 6 Div. 42, Department of Indus. Relations v. Walker

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Alabama - 109 So.2d 131 (Ala.App. 1956), 6 Div. 994, Department of Indus. Relations v. Walker
Alabama - 109 So.2d 919 (Ala. 1959), 8 Div. 957, Southern Ry. Co. v. Terry
Alabama - 51 So.2d 544 (Ala.App. 1951), 6 Div. 121, Gulf Atlantic Warehouse Co. v. Bennett
Alabama - 75 So.2d 165 (Ala. 1954), 6 Div. 528, Usher v. Department of Indus. Relations
Alabama - 82 So.2d 435 (Ala.App. 1955), 6 Div. 913, Department of Indus. Relations v. Savage

See all quotations