109 S.E.2d 868 (Ga.App. 1959), 37698, Curtis v. State

Citation: 109 S.E.2d 868, 99 Ga.App. 732

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: Lee CURTIS, Jr. v. The STATE.

Attorney: or sale of such securities which are carried on with intent to defraud. An indictment alleging such a scheme or transaction is not subject to general demurrer although it fails to allege that the victim was in fact defrauded, since the only criminal intent necessary to be proved is the intent to ...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and CARLISLE, J., concur.

Case Date: Thursday June 25, 1959

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals