109 S.E. 269 (N.C. 1921), 287, In re Edens' Will

Citation: 109 S.E. 269, 182 N.C. 398

Opinion Judge: STACY, J. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: IN RE EDENS' WILL.

Attorney: Johnson & Johnson and McNeill & Hackett, all of Lumberton, Sinclair, Dye & Clark, of Fayetteville, and McLean, Varser, McLean & Stacy, of Lumberton, for appellants. C. W. Tillett, of Charlotte, Stephen McIntyre, of Lumberton, G. B. Patterson, of Maxton, and Britt & Britt, of Lumberton, for appell...

Case Date: Wednesday November 09, 1921

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

109 S.E. 269 (N.C. 1921), 287, In re Edens' Will

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 52 N.C. 593 (N.C. 1860), Cornelius v. Cornelius
North Carolina - 106 S.E. 24 (N.C. 1921), 98, Shaw Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Acme Hosiery Mills, Inc.
North Carolina - 107 S.E. 129 (N.C. 1921), 480, Burris v. Litaker
North Carolina - 109 S.E. 267 (N.C. 1921), 400, Cauble v. Southern Exp. Co.
North Carolina - 75 S.E. 803 (N.C. 1912), Dickerson v. Dail

See all quotations