109 Cal.App.2d 381, 4335, Solomon v. Walton

Citation: 109 Cal.App.2d 381, 241 P.2d 49

Opinion Judge: [10] Mussell

Party Name: Solomon v. Walton

Attorney: [7] Miller & Sinclair, Elizabeth Murray and Max Bergman for Appellants. [8] T. R. Claflin, John M. Nairn and Kline, Barton & Stanley for Respondents.

Case Date: February 21, 1952

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

109 Cal.App.2d 381, 4335, Solomon v. Walton

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 140 Cal. 175, L. A. 1274, De Leonis v. Walsh
California - 203 Cal. 246, S. F. 11945, Figlietti v. Frick
California - 26 Cal.2d 196, 19138, Fackrell v. City of San Diego
California - 45 Cal.App.2d 334, 12805, Gogo v. L. A. Etc. Flood Control Dist.
California - 50 Cal.App.2d 549, 2666, Royal Ins. Co. v. Mazzei

See all quotations