108 S.E. 389 (N.C. 1921), 120, Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Imp. Co.

Citation: 108 S.E. 389, 182 N.C. 107

Opinion Judge: STACY, J.

Party Name: ROSE v. FREMONT WAREHOUSE & IMPROVEMENT CO. ET AL.

Attorney: E. M. Land and Dickinson & Freeman, all of Goldsboro, for Fremont Warehouse & Improvement Co. W. A. Lucas, of Wilson, and Langston, Allen & Taylor, of Goldsboro, for Benton & Benton.

Case Date: Wednesday October 05, 1921

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

108 S.E. 389 (N.C. 1921), 120, Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Imp. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 106 S.E. 664 (N.C. 1921), 285, Roberts v. Utility Mfg. Co.
North Carolina - 28 S.E. 297 (N.C. 1897), Hamer v. McCall
North Carolina - 28 S.E. 297 (N.C. 1897), Cromartie v. Parker
North Carolina - 41 S.E. 484 (N.C. 1902), Morton v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
North Carolina - 65 S.E. 750 (N.C. 1909), Pittsburg Lumber Co. v. Rowe

See all quotations