108 S.E.2d 587 (S.C. 1959), 17531, Godfrey v. Mills Mill No. 2

Citation: 108 S.E.2d 587, 234 S.C. 401

Opinion Judge: OXNER, justice.

Party Name: Broadus S. GODFREY, Respondent, v. MILLS MILL NO. 2 (Reeves Brothers, Inc.), and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Carlisle, Brown & Carlisle, of Spartanburg, for Appellants, cite: As to Statute here in question being ambiguous and therefore subject to judicial construction: 50 Am. Jur., Statutes, Secs. 225. 226. As to the expression Shall Be Required being ambiguous: 206 S.C. 300, 34 S.E.2d 49; 69 S....

Case Date: May 11, 1959

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court