108 S.E.2d 161 (Ga.App. 1959), 37575, Slaughter v. State

Citation: 108 S.E.2d 161, 99 Ga.App. 239

Opinion Judge: TOWNSEND, Judge.

Party Name: SLAUGHTER v. STATE.

Attorney: (b) Nor was the indictment subject to demurrer because showing on its face that the defendant had been entrapped into committing the crime of bribery. An entrapment does not exist merely because an officer of the law furnishes another an opportunity to commit an offense which he is ready and will...

Judge Panel: GARDNER, P. J., and CARLISLE, J., concur.

Case Date: Monday March 09, 1959

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

108 S.E.2d 161 (Ga.App. 1959), 37575, Slaughter v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 113 S.E. 446 (Ga. 1922), 3236, Payne v. State
Georgia - 157 S.E. 664 (Ga. 1931), 7831, Slicer v. State
Georgia - 161 S.E. 793 (Ga.App. 1931), 21602, Taylor v. State
Georgia - 103 S.E.2d 666 (Ga.App. 1958), 37097, Ingram v. State
Georgia - 63 S.E.2d 682 (Ga.App. 1951), 33416, Crowe v. State

See all quotations