107 S.E.2d 727 (Ga.App. 1959), 37556, Dukes v. State

Citation: 107 S.E.2d 727, 99 Ga.App. 81

Party Name: Billy DUKES v. STATE.

Attorney: The evidence here, although circumstantial, excludes every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Accordingly, the motion for a new trial on the general grounds was properly denied., Billy Dukes was tried and convicted in the City Court of Chattooga County on an accusa...

Case Date: Tuesday February 10, 1959

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

107 S.E.2d 727 (Ga.App. 1959), 37556, Dukes v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 166 S.E. 455 (Ga.App. 1932), 22706, Mosely v. State
Georgia - 34 S.E. 135 (Ga. 1899), Dorsey v. State
Georgia - 103 S.E.2d 450 (Ga.App. 1958), 37088, Butts v. State
Georgia - 107 S.E.2d 887 (Ga.App. 1959), 37454, Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Poole
Georgia - 44 S.E.2d 297 (Ga.App. 1947), 31563, Patrick v. State

See all quotations