106 Cal.App.4th 1139, B155744, Scognamillo v. Herrick

Citation: 106 Cal.App.4th 1139, 131 Cal.Rptr.2d 393

Opinion Judge: [9] The opinion of the court was delivered by: Vogel (c.s.), P.J.

Party Name: Scognamillo v. Herrick

Attorney: [7] Horvitz & Levy, David M. Axelrad and Karen M. Bray; Millard, Pilchowski, Holweger, Child & Marton, Andrew J. Marton and Russell W. Schatz for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Law Office of Scott D. Dinsmore and Scott D. Dinsmore for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Monday March 10, 2003

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

106 Cal.App.4th 1139, B155744, Scognamillo v. Herrick

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 11 Cal.2d 576, 15850, Bellman v. San Francisco H. S. Dist.
California - 38 Cal.3d 227, 24678, Elston v. City of Turlock
California - 172 Cal.App.2d 639, 23533, Heathman v. Vant
California - 270 Cal.App.2d 275, 32316, Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Limited
California - 131 Cal.App.3d 695, 25464, Don v. Cruz

See all quotations