104 Cal.App.3d 767, 46288, Romak Iron Works v. Prudential Ins. Co.

Citation: 104 Cal.App.3d 767, 163 Cal.Rptr. 869

Opinion Judge: [10] Rattigan

Party Name: Romak Iron Works v. Prudential Ins. Co.

Attorney: [7] Chandler & Bruner and Stephen M. Chandler for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Julian E. Hultgren, Edward S. Rusky, John H. Bickel, Mary Beth Uitti, Landels, Ripley & Diamond, John R. Hetland and Anthony G. Wilson for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday April 17, 1980

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

104 Cal.App.3d 767, 46288, Romak Iron Works v. Prudential Ins. Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 15 Cal.2d 82, 16106, Weber v. County of Santa Barbara
California - 15 Cal.3d 590, 30393, Cornelison v. Kornbluth
California - 17 Cal.3d 803, 23225, Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior Court
California - 24 Cal.3d 458, 23625, Gay Law Students Assn. v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co.
California - 272 Cal.App.2d 336, 9072, Windsor Mills v. Richard B. Smith, Inc.

See all quotations