104 A.2d 875 (N.J.Super.L. 1954), 96762, Burrock v. Tung Sol Lamp Works, Inc.

Citation: 104 A.2d 875, 30 N.J.Super. 456

Opinion Judge: GAULKIN, J.C.C.

Party Name: BURROCK v. TUNG SOL LAMP WORKS, Inc.

Attorney: Shaw, Hughes & Pindar, Newark (William T. McElroy, Newark, appearing), attorneys for respondent-appellant. Gross & Blumberg, Newark (Mabel L. Richardson, Newark, appearing), attorneys for petitioner-appellee.

Case Date: Thursday April 29, 1954

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

104 A.2d 875 (N.J.Super.L. 1954), 96762, Burrock v. Tung Sol Lamp Works, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Colorado - 121 P.2d 489 (Colo. 1942), 15046, Downs v. Industrial Com'n of Colo.
Illinois - 147 N.E. 375 (Ill. 1925), 16535, Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. Industrial Commission
Indiana - 197 N.E. 737 (Ind.App. 1935), 15,521, Cunya v. Vance
New Jersey - 13 A.2d 665 (N.J.Misc. 1940), McCadden v. West End Building and Loan Association, A Corp.
New Jersey - 17 A.2d 65 (N.J. 1940), 217, McCadden v. West End Building & Loan Association, A Corp.

See all quotations