104 A.2d 74 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1954), C-256, Manice v. Howard Sav. Institution

Citation: 104 A.2d 74, 30 N.J.Super. 267

Opinion Judge: FREUND, J.S.C.

Party Name: MANICE v. HOWARD SAV. INSTITUTION.

Attorney: Saul J. Zucker, Newark, for plaintiff (Kristeller & Zucker, Newark, attorneys). Corwin Howell, Newark, for defendant (Pitney, Hardin & Ward, Newark, attorneys).

Case Date: Friday March 26, 1954

Court: New Jersey Superior Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

104 A.2d 74 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1954), C-256, Manice v. Howard Sav. Institution

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Arizona - 243 P.2d 468 (Ariz. 1952), 5510, Dreyer v. Lange
California - 33 Cal.2d 495, 20164, Bixby v. California Trust Co.
Illinois - 27 N.E.2d 529 (Ill. 1940), 25451, Sutliff v. Aydelott
New Jersey - 141 A. 267 (N.J.Super.Ch. 1928), The Hamilton Trust Company of Paterson v. Bamford
New Jersey - 147 A. 909 (N.J.Eq. 1929), Hamilton Trust Company of Paterson v. Bamford

See all quotations