104 A.2d 441 (N.J. 1954), A-118, Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of Dumont

Citation: 104 A.2d 441, 15 N.J. 238

Opinion Judge: VANDERBILT, C.J.

Party Name: BOROUGH OF CRESSKILL et al. v. BOROUGH OF DUMONT.

Attorney: Guy W. Calissi, Hackensack, argued the cause for the appellant. Arthur J. O'Dea, Hackensack, Frank H. Hennessy, Englewood, William A. Fasolo, Hackensack, argued the cause for the respondents.

Judge Panel: OLIPHANT, J., concurring in result. For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN-6. For reversal: Justice Wachenfeld-1.

Case Date: Monday April 05, 1954

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

104 A.2d 441 (N.J. 1954), A-118, Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of Dumont

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New Jersey - 100 A.2d 182 (N.J.Super.L. 1953), L-3019, Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of Dumont
New Jersey - 73 A.2d 540 (N.J. 1950), No. A--139, Menges v. The Township of Bernards
New Jersey - 84 A.2d 715 (N.J. 1951), A-36, Speakman v. Mayor & Council of Borough of North Plainfield
New Jersey - 87 A.2d 9 (N.J. 1952), A-68, Monmouth Lumber Company v. Township of Ocean
New Jersey - 88 A.2d 607 (N.J. 1952), A-81, Schmidt v. Board of Adjustment of The City of Newark

See all quotations